App: [HOLD for payment 2023-07-21] [$1000] Web - Heading after quote is not rendering

If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!


Action Performed:

  1. Go a chat and add a comment
> quote
# heading
  1. Notice that heading is displayed in plain text

Expected Result:

Heading should be rendered

Actual Result:

Markdown heading syntax is not rendering

Workaround:

Unknown

Platforms:

Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?

  • Android / native
  • Android / Chrome
  • iOS / native
  • iOS / Safari
  • MacOS / Chrome / Safari
  • MacOS / Desktop

Version Number: 1.3.32-5 Reproducible in staging?: y Reproducible in production?: y If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail: Email or phone of affected tester (no customers): Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856 Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation

https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/93399543/8626f832-2e3e-4705-9f42-59b82d7d7172 https://github.com/Expensify/App/assets/93399543/7f95a2a1-6c96-4a48-afbe-712edae38043

Expensify/Expensify Issue URL: Issue reported by: @eh2077 Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1687921581684809

View all open jobs on GitHub

Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
  • Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~01e498007bd2f0de5b
  • Upwork Job ID: 1674345101139329024
  • Last Price Increase: 2023-07-06

About this issue

  • Original URL
  • State: closed
  • Created a year ago
  • Comments: 85 (69 by maintainers)

Most upvoted comments

@code0406 and @spcheema Thank you for your continuous work here. I think we can go with @spcheema’s proposal.

🎀 👀 🎀 C+ reviewed

Not overdue per @conorpendergrast 's update above

Thanks @cead22 and @s77rt.

I have updated the hash 0c685f8 and raise another PR for the APP

Here is the link https://github.com/Expensify/App/pull/22478

@cead22 and I agree with an exception here as the C and C+ acted with urgency.

Everyone has been paid accordingly, and contracts ended. We’re all done, thanks!

I will check in on is one, and confirm before paying. I’m OoO on Monday and Tuesday, and will be back to this on Wednesday 26th with confirmation

@conorpendergrast @s77rt Please consider following timings for bonus eligibility:

Action Timing
Issue assigned 2023-07-06T23:43:37Z
E\Common PR up for review 2023-07-08T05:31:21Z
C++ approved 2023-07-08T11:25:07Z
PR merged 2023-07-10T20:31:41Z
E\APP PR up for review 2023-07-10T22:12:45Z
C++ approved 2023-07-11T05:33:17Z
PR merged 2023-07-12T16:43:13Z

After C++ reviewed & approved, following timeline is waiting for internal reviewer to approve and merge the PR.

  1. Waiting time for E\Common PR approval & merge: 2 days 9 hours 6 minutes 34 seconds

  2. Waiting time for E\APP PR approval & merge: 1 days 11 hours 9 minutes 56 seconds

Total waiting time (internal & merge): 3 days 20hrs approx.

Total time elapsed from issue assigned to second PR merged: 5 days 16 hours 59 minutes 36 seconds

@cead22 @s77rt PR is up for review Expensify/expensify-common#557

@spcheema this is merged now

@cead22 @s77rt PR is up for review https://github.com/Expensify/expensify-common/pull/557

Kindly review it and then I’ll raise another one to update the expensify-common lib in the App

📣 It’s been a week! Do we have any satisfactory proposals yet? Do we need to adjust the bounty for this issue? 💸

@code0406 Thanks for the update. I think that solution is more complicated than it should be.

@code0406 I think the alternative solution is suggested by @spcheema already. For now we are looking for better solutions

okay. I will share the better solution soon.

@spcheema Oops we just inverted the bug 😅. I don’t think we should go with option 1 for now, it’s better to find a solution that does not involve making one rule aware of the other, let’s make that our last resort solution. Please update your proposal and tag me again.