aspnetcore: Cannot pass through directive attributes, so components can't support @on{EVENT}:stopPropagation etc.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
This feature relates to https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/18460 where I’m building a custom styled component and want to keep all features for a simple tag, eg:
<div class="@boxClass" @attributes="AdditionalAttributes">
@ChildContent
</div>
@code {
[Parameter(CaptureUnmatchedValues = true)]
public IDictionary<string, object>? AdditionalAttributes { get; set; }
}
where, @boxClass is generated somewhere else. All attributes works except the @on{EVENT} in combination with @on{EVENT}:stopPropagation and/or @on{EVENT}:preventDefault.
Describe the solution you’d like
I’d expect that if I’m able to pass down the event handler it should be possible to pass the event custom attributes also since it’s not practical (could be for a workaround) to have two flags for each possible event and declare them into the component.
Additional context
None
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: open
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions: 6
- Comments: 20 (13 by maintainers)
Hi @SteveSandersonMS,
I came across this issue (again) and decided to look at code this time. For library developers who want to support arbitrary event listeners on their components, there’s just no way around attribute splatting, but that mechanism doesn’t support
@onclick="Handler" @onclick:stopPropagation="Stop", becauseRZ10010(“The component parameter 'onclick' is used two or more times for this component. Parameters must be unique (case-insensitive). The component parameter 'onclick' is generated by the '@onclick:stopPropagation' directive attribute.”) will prevent compiling that code.The thing is: I don’t at all see why that’s the case! This is what I observed with the razor compiler:
@{eventName}:stopPropagation="value"(and similarlypreventDefault), will generate the code__builder.AddEventStopPropagationAttribute(seq, eventName, value);AddEventStopPropagationAttributeis implemented inWebRenderTreeBuilderExtensionswith a one-liner: https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/blob/a4154ac58b07bce7ddb086427c1bc8a13073babd/src/Components/Web/src/Web/WebRenderTreeBuilderExtensions.cs#L50AddEventStopPropagationAttributeis implemented asbuilder.AddAttribute(sequence, $"__internal_stopPropagation_{eventName}", value);,@{eventName}:stopPropagation="value"could be replaced by__internal_stopPropagation_{eventName}="@value"with the exact same effect asAddEventStopPropagationAttribute.stopPropagationbehavior is correctly applied.This makes me wonder why
RZ10010is there in the first place. The implementation does not use the same attribute name twice at all (because one attribute is namedonclickand the other__internal_stopPropagation_onclick).Could it perhaps be that this is an error that was necessary in some old version of blazor, but now is just obsolete because implementation changed?
Can you please explain to me why this isn’t priotized, how is blazor useable when you can’t control events triggering upwards into the other components? It just results in a mess… parent components doing things when a child component get clicked…This ticket has been here since 2020, this should have been fixed a long time ago. I don’t see how blazor is useable without this.
You don’t have to increment the sequence numbers.
I apologize in advance, that I have not figured out the details, and unfortunately, I don’t have time to spend on this as I am heads down on Blazor united work. Take my suggestion as a rough sketch and play with it if you want, it might not pan out, but I think it can potentially be done.
Hi - did this get reviewed for ASP.NET 7? @stefanloerwald was working with us on Material.Blazor at the time of his comments 18 months back, and it would be good to have a resolution.
Parent.razor
Child.razor
Some extension method
Ok, I found a way using RenderFragment
so the user can use like this
And I agree about
@keyand@refbut they are standalone attributes while the@on{EVENT}:stopPropagationis not. Maybe there are some middle ground where we can capture these events directives the same way we capture unmatched parameters. But my way works fine for now.