docker-vernemq: New version 1.12.1 results in /lib/env.sh: No such file or directory
Hi together,
we just realized that the new version jump from 1.11.0 to 1.12.1 results in minikube and k3s in an error /lib/env.sh: No such file or directory
Using the previous version 1.11.0 fixed the issue for us.
See also: https://github.com/united-manufacturing-hub/united-manufacturing-hub/issues/375
Greetings from Germany! Jeremy
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 3 years ago
- Reactions: 1
- Comments: 16 (8 by maintainers)
Iโve now manually uploaded local builds for 1.12.1 and 1.12.1-alpine. Could you guys give them a test, regarding original issue? https://hub.docker.com/repository/docker/vernemq/vernemq/tags?page=1&ordering=last_updated
Thanks!
๐ Thank you for supporting VerneMQ: https://github.com/sponsors/vernemq ๐ Using the binary VerneMQ packages (.deb/.rpm/Docker) requires a subscription.
The issue is fully identified. The Docker images pull the tarballs from the release binaries here on Github. Due to a patch to adjust the correct paths on .deb and .rpm packages, the tarballs had wrong internal paths set, making the Docker images unusuable.
New images should be up soon, but please bear with me, itโs more work than it might sound like.
๐ Thank you for supporting VerneMQ: https://github.com/sponsors/vernemq ๐ Using the binary VerneMQ packages (.deb/.rpm/Docker) requires a subscription.
@JeremyTheocharis Deployed our stack with 1.12.1, vernemq starts successfully.
I will try it tomorrow ! Thanks for your quick action !
Hi @ioolkos,
Both
1.12.1and1.12.1-alpineis failing. Something is wrong with the latest VerneMQ binary. Replacing it with version1.12.0fixed the issue.Error log:
@JeremyTheocharis thanks, ugh, thatโs bad. I was thinking I had this fixed. Itโs a path issue. I need to investigate.
EDIT: With what package from Dockerhub is this happening exactly?