sos: The stop/fail/warn_if series of actions

The skip option had a long history from VPT and is used to skip a section

[10: skip=True]

It was supposed to be used for

  1. Quickly comment on a step but renaming the step would have the same effect.
  2. Enable certain steps depending on the complexity of the workflow (e.g. sos run --quality-control true) but we already have many ways to do the same (e.g. subworkflow).

I have never used it for any production code and do not see a good usage for it.

About this issue

  • Original URL
  • State: closed
  • Created 6 years ago
  • Comments: 46 (46 by maintainers)

Commits related to this issue

Most upvoted comments

Yes, that sounds better than stop_if(no_output=True/False). We have swing between different options quite a few times now, let us finalize it this way.