rclone: rclone Keeps Failing to Copy File with "corrupted on transfer" (local->crypt->mount)

What is the problem you are having with rclone?

Than I crypt local folder and mount it on windows 10, i get this massage: log.txt

"ERROR : IO error: failed to transfer file from cache to remote: corrupted on transfer: MD5 crypted hash differ “cd60ea4dd2e9e81e702bc637df404751” vs “35f640a1fd3ae61ad81581496f86a60b”

What is your rclone version (output from rclone version)

rclone v1.51.0

• os/arch: windows/amd64
• go version: go1.13.7

Which OS you are using and how many bits (eg Windows 7, 64 bit)

Windows 10 64bit

Which cloud storage system are you using? (eg Google Drive)

Local

The command you were trying to run (eg rclone copy /tmp remote:tmp)

.\rclone mount lo_crpt: p: --vfs-cache-mode writes

[lo_crpt] type = crypt remote = e:\iokpb_cr\ filename_encryption = off directory_name_encryption = false password = *** ENCRYPTED *** password2 = *** ENCRYPTED ***

Then i make text file in note and save and get error, without key --vfs-cache-mode the system is work, but i can not edit the file

A log from the command with the -vv flag (eg output from rclone -vv copy /tmp remote:tmp)

The service rclone has been started. 2020/03/03 16:04:49 ERROR : kjdfhgjdfkdfk.txt: Failed to copy: corrupted on transfer: MD5 crypted hash differ “7cfd006a83f095b44dc1a4ea0ed75da4” vs “b077f73d494a4d595a490dedc46ae797” 2020/03/03 16:04:49 ERROR : kjdfhgjdfkdfk.txt(0xc000112480): failed to transfer file from cache to remote: corrupted on transfer: MD5 crypted hash differ “7cfd006a83f095b44dc1a4ea0ed75da4” vs “b077f73d494a4d595a490dedc46ae797” 2020/03/03 16:04:49 ERROR : kjdfhgjdfkdfk.txt(0xc000112480): RWFileHandle.Flush error: failed to transfer file from cache to remote: corrupted on transfer: MD5 crypted hash differ “7cfd006a83f095b44dc1a4ea0ed75da4” vs “b077f73d494a4d595a490dedc46ae797” 2020/03/03 16:04:49 ERROR : IO error: failed to transfer file from cache to remote: corrupted on transfer: MD5 crypted hash differ “7cfd006a83f095b44dc1a4ea0ed75da4” vs “b077f73d494a4d595a490dedc46ae797”