poetry: Dataclasses solver failure with conditional python marker
-
I am on the latest Poetry version.
-
I have searched the issues of this repo and believe that this is not a duplicate.
-
If an exception occurs when executing a command, I executed it again in debug mode (
-vvv
option). -
Linux (Fedora 32):
-
Poetry version:
$ poetry debug info
Poetry
Version: 1.0.5
Python: 3.8.2
Virtualenv
Python: 3.8.2
Implementation: CPython
Path: /home/projects/poetry-dataclasses/poetry-demo/.venv
Valid: True
System
Platform: linux
OS: posix
Python: /usr
pyproject.yaml
[tool.poetry]
name = "poetry-demo"
version = "0.1.0"
description = ""
authors = []
[tool.poetry.dependencies]
python = "^3.6.1"
dataclasses = {version = "^0.7", python = "~3.6.1"}
dacite = "^1.5.0"
[build-system]
requires = ["poetry>=0.12"]
build-backend = "poetry.masonry.api"
Issue
Following on from #1413, the solution there seems to suggest user python version markers to specify when to install a conditional dependencty - in my case the dataclasses-backport on python 3.6.*. However this seems to result in a SolverProblemError
resolving in certain cases even with the python specifier as indicated in my pyproject.yaml
above .
Things seem to work fine until I also install the addional library dacite
(https://github.com/konradhalas/dacite) - which also has a dependency on dataclasses when using python 3.6. The setup.py
for it is as follows,
install_requires=['dataclasses;python_version<"3.7"'],
Once this library is also installed, adding any other packages to my project results in the aforementioned SolverProblemError
, e.g.
$ poetry add arrow
Using version ^0.15.6 for arrow
Updating dependencies
Resolving dependencies... (0.0s)
[SolverProblemError]
The current project's Python requirement (^3.6.1) is not compatible with some of the required packages Python requirement:
- dataclasses requires Python >=3.6, <3.7
Because dataclasses (0.7) requires Python >=3.6, <3.7
and no versions of dataclasses match >0.7,<0.8, dataclasses is forbidden.
So, because poetry-demo depends on dataclasses (^0.7), version solving failed.
Commenting then uncommenting out either my use of dataclasses
or dacite
in my pyproject.toml
to add additional libraries works, but it seems that both my projects and dacite’s use of dataclasses with a conditional python marker conflict in poetry.
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 4 years ago
- Reactions: 6
- Comments: 23 (4 by maintainers)
Commits related to this issue
- ci: Lock python 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/unihan-etl by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/unihan-db by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/cihai-cli by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/cihai by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Add python at 3.9, but not 3.10 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to vcs-python/libvcs by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to vcs-python/vcspull by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/cihai by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to vcs-python/vcspull by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Add python at 3.9, but not 3.10 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to vcs-python/libvcs by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/cihai-cli by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/unihan-etl by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python at 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/unihan-db by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/unihan-etl by tony 3 years ago
- ci: Lock python 3.9 to avoid poetry bug See also: https://github.com/python-poetry/poetry/issues/2386 — committed to cihai/unihan-etl by tony 3 years ago
As the original submitter, I can still reproduce this on the latest Poetry (1.0.9), when running
poetry add <anypackage>
within a Python 3.8 venv.For more context, I’m building an application that runs on any Python from >= 3.6.1, and < 4.0.0 that requires the
dataclasses
library. Asdataclasses
is only required when developing using / when a user is running on Python >= 3.6.1 and < 3.7.0, I’ve set a conditional marker - however I develop myself within a Python 3.8 venv. I don’t believe that this is a user error, as I imagine Poetry supports such a configuration (Poetry’s ownpyproject.toml
has a similar dataclasses constraint) so I’m not sure what’s not working here.The only way I can get it to work right now is by commenting the
dataclasses
package in mypyproject.toml
, adding the additional package I want viapoetry add
, and then uncommentingdataclasses
again.My
pyproject.toml
is,The output from running
poetry add <anypackage> -vvv
isHaving a lot of trouble with this. If a dependency itself depends on a restricted version of
dataclasses
you also get this error, even if you don’t depend ondataclasses
yourself.Similar issue:
where
{some-lib}
uses a pyproject.toml withSo, what’s up with
dataclasses (^0.6) which doesn't match any versions
?Also, there are some PyPi packages that have started to declare minimal python versions of
3.6.1
and this seems to force the consumer to also use that minimal version, but then another issue arises like:An example of a 3rd-party lib causing conflict with the minimal python version when the project is trying to use
python = ">=3.6, <3.9.0"
, which should be OK with dataclasses, is the following.But then:
This is impossible. My {some-lib} is allowed to be used in python >= 3.6, < 4.0 and I expect to be able to use dataclasses anytime that python is a 3.6.x version (and since pre-commit is only a dev-dep, it will never be installed when {some-lib} is installed, so dataclasses trumps pre-commit, and if the actual python is 3.6.0 I don’t care if pre-commit cannot be installed), so the following solver error is some kind of a bug:
So long as the dataclasses is restricted to a subset of the project python versions (i.e. the project python versions subsume all the versions allowed by dataclasses), it should pass OK. Consider even the extreme case where all of the dataclasses versions are entirely outside the range of versions allowed by the project (i.e. no version intersection), it could still allow the inclusion of the dataclasses dependency and issue a warning that it is never going to be installed anywhere that the project is allowed. Whenever there is any version intersection between the project python versions and the dependency python versions, that means the dependency could be installed and should be allowed to pass without warning or error.
Somehow, poetry is using too-tight coupling of project python versions with dependency versions. Something about the sets of allowed dependency intersections needs to be relaxed for the package-spec. The actual package installation rules are another matter entirely, because the range of options are restricted by the actual python version involved at the time of installation.
In the case of
dataclasses
, there is an implicit, not explicit, understanding that the package is not required for any python >= 3.7.0, so when the project declares that it can be used in a range of pythons > 3.6 but it only needs dataclasses for 3.6, it’s like an implicit declaration that dataclasses is a “required option” only for py 3.6. Somehow the version-specs and the “optional” or “extra” specs are not fully capturing this implicit intention. i.e.It might be cool if we could declare
optional = true, required = "~3.6.0"
or something to suggest that this package is normally optional but when the installation is on py3.6, then it is required.IMO, maybe python should be fully backporting dataclasses into all current py3.6 releases, rather than providing this backport as a package. Give py3.6 this little extra battery that should be included.
In case it might help, python, dataclasses and pre-commit seem to play OK together using:
This combination of specs was arrived at by a combination of poetry commands and manual edits. When dataclasses version is specified using
^0.6
, it seems to install only0.6
and not allow an update to0.7
. (For consumers of this lib with these specs, there might be a problem with the*
version for dataclasses, TBD.)Now without the additional package, just drop the patch version for dataclases.
Reproducible in
1.0.10
.This should be fixed in
1.1.0b2
.Same problem as @mands
>=3.6
/3.6.1
/^3.6
/^3.6.1
poetry add dataclasses --python ">=3.6, <3.7"
poetry add --dev black
I can confirm the workaround above works. (Remove dataclasses, add new package, re-add dataclasses)
@xylix see #2950
This happens when adding black
^20.8b1
to dev requirements.Unfortunately, I have to install black separately because of this issue 😦
Poetry could print a hint or offer to fix the project requirements with one of the available options that would allow to proceed.