istio: Performance Regression of Istio master/release-1.6
Our performance test run (http://perf.dashboard.istio.io/benchmarks/latency_vs_connection/) has detected Istio master/release-1.6 regression since around Feb 18.
For tracing back and debugging: our performance test labels changed a lot since last month, you cannot see those plotted data for that date. But you can check the test .csv data from the artifacts page: http://perf.dashboard.istio.io/artifacts/
Here is the graph I plotted for P99:
- [release-1.5/Feb-13] https://gcsweb.istio.io/gcs/istio-build/perf/benchmark_data-release-1.5.20200213-08.9672b2c/
- [master/Feb-14] https://gcsweb.istio.io/gcs/istio-build/perf/benchmark_data-master.20200214-00.445524d
- [release-1.5/Feb-19] https://gcsweb.istio.io/gcs/istio-build/perf/benchmark_data-release-1.5.20200219-08.3892338
- [master/Feb-18] https://gcsweb.istio.io/gcs/istio-build/perf/benchmark_data-master.20200218-00.c50c8a4
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments: 28 (28 by maintainers)
Commits related to this issue
- Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency Hopefully this will resolve https://github.com/istio/istio/issues/22845 Previously, we were setting concurrency from proxy config if it was set. By default this ... — committed to howardjohn/istio by howardjohn 4 years ago
- Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency (#23472) * Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency Hopefully this will resolve https://github.com/istio/istio/issues/22845 Previously, we were setting concurrency ... — committed to istio/istio by howardjohn 4 years ago
- Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency (#23472) * Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency Hopefully this will resolve https://github.com/istio/istio/issues/22845 Previously, we were setting concurrency ... — committed to richardwxn/istio by howardjohn 4 years ago
- [release-1.6] Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency (#23472) (#23518) * Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency (#23472) * Avoid accidental dynamic concurrency Hopefully this will resolve https://githu... — committed to istio/istio by richardwxn 4 years ago
@lambdai I think that is wrong legend, you can ignore it, since after that like release-1.5 Feb-19 is the correct order. I guess that might because either test label is incorrect or not being parsed correctly. Since we made some changes on adjusting test labels.