llm-ls: GLIBC_2.32 not found when running under Ubuntu 20.04.6

Getting this:

[Error - 1:44:15 PM] The LLM VS Code server crashed 5 times in the last 3 minutes. The server will not be restarted. See the output for more information.
/home/user/.vscode-server/extensions/huggingface.huggingface-vscode-0.1.0-linux-x64/server/llm-ls: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.32' not found (required by /home/user/.vscode-server/extensions/huggingface.huggingface-vscode-0.1.0-linux-x64/server/llm-ls)
/home/user/.vscode-server/extensions/huggingface.huggingface-vscode-0.1.0-linux-x64/server/llm-ls: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.33' not found (required by /home/user/.vscode-server/extensions/huggingface.huggingface-vscode-0.1.0-linux-x64/server/llm-ls)
/home/user/.vscode-server/extensions/huggingface.huggingface-vscode-0.1.0-linux-x64/server/llm-ls: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.34' not found (required by /home/user/.vscode-server/extensions/huggingface.huggingface-vscode-0.1.0-linux-x64/server/llm-ls)

About this issue

Original URL
State: open
Created 9 months ago
Comments: 28 (8 by maintainers)

Commits related to this issue

fix: #25 — committed to kalinkrustev/llm-ls by kalinkrustev 9 months ago
fix: #25 — committed to kalinkrustev/llm-ls by kalinkrustev 9 months ago
fix: #25 — committed to kalinkrustev/llm-ls by kalinkrustev 9 months ago
fix: #25 — committed to kalinkrustev/llm-ls by kalinkrustev 9 months ago

Most upvoted comments

We are dealing with this is issue on our Cent OS 8 system.
ldd --version
ldd (GNU libc) 2.17
What is the solution to this so far? We really have to compile for older version of GLIBC?

Check my fork, where I disabled the Alpine build and instead released the Ubuntu binary with statically linked GLIBC. Check the released asset llm-ls-x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.gz, it should be usable under older Ubuntu and others.

kalinkrustev on Oct 11, 2023

There is no need to build on Ubuntu 20.04. The build target should be x86_64-unknown-linux-musl for static linking. I did some experiments and the produced binary runs fine with this target. The bad thing is that for this target name, the build happens under Alpine and produces an Alpine binary, which overwrites the same one built on Ubuntu. Maybe some change on the binary names could help, so that musl target is released for both Alpine and Ubuntu. I am not sure if x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu has any advantage over x86_64-unknown-linux-musl.

kalinkrustev on Oct 3, 2023

See #33, not so perfect solution at the moment.

kalinkrustev on Oct 13, 2023

Well, I guess the solution would be to build on ubuntu 20.04. I’ve had issues setting up the build CI and I won’t be taking a look at this in the short term, I have too many things to do 😅 If someone wants to give it a go, you can play around with the workflows in .github, my inspiration came from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer.

For now the best workaround would be to compile llm-ls yourself, which shouldn’t be too hard:

clone the repo & cd into it
install rust
cargo build --release

You may encounter some odd compile time errors.

McPatate on Oct 3, 2023