core: Connection to TP-Link LTE router fails with MR-6400 v5
The problem
Hello,
Login to TP-Link LTE router with the tplink_lte core integration fails at login time, preventing the associated SMS service to be instantiated.
Declared issue here with HA core 2022.6.6 but actually never worked even with pre-2022.
My TP-Link LTE router is MR6400, running firmware v5.
Error doing job: Task exception was never retrieved
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/usr/src/homeassistant/homeassistant/components/tplink_lte/__init__.py", line 122, in _setup_lte
await _login(hass, modem_data, password)
File "/usr/src/homeassistant/homeassistant/components/tplink_lte/__init__.py", line 137, in _login
await modem_data.modem.login(password=password)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/tp_connected/tp_connected.py", line 130, in login
await self.encryptCredentials(password, username)
File "/usr/local/lib/python3.9/site-packages/tp_connected/tp_connected.py", line 114, in encryptCredentials
_LOGGER.debug("ee: {0} nn: {1}".format(ee, nn))
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'nn' referenced before assignment
What version of Home Assistant Core has the issue?
core-2022-6-6
What was the last working version of Home Assistant Core?
No response
What type of installation are you running?
Home Assistant Supervised
Integration causing the issue
TP-Link LTE
Link to integration documentation on our website
https://www.home-assistant.io/integrations/tplink_lte/
Diagnostics information
No response
Example YAML snippet
tplink_lte:
- host: local.ip.address.here
password: !secret tplink_lte_password
notify:
- name: SMSGatewaySurname
recipient: "+xxx"
Anything in the logs that might be useful for us?
No response
Additional information
No response
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments: 15 (1 by maintainers)
What can be done if there is no response to the issues registered ? Should we make a request to remove this integration fro the list since it does not work? On the Integration page of HA it says that it is used by 24 active installations - which probably means that it is installed in such number of installations but if it working ?