harbor-operator: Too many replica set are created for registry-ctl component
Run make sample
Then check the resource, you’ll find more than one registry-ctl replica sets that with 0, 0.
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-589b8bb8df 1 1 1 2m16s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-5bbf7d4889 0 0 0 2m36s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-644bd8fdbf 0 0 0 2m47s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-644d9549b6 0 0 0 2m50s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-687bbd59cd 0 0 0 2m34s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-6988fbbfbd 0 0 0 2m42s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-7464d974bb 0 0 0 2m45s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-74c6d4f8cc 0 0 0 2m35s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-7569fb84f4 0 0 0 2m52s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-79cc6ccbf 0 0 0 2m46s
replicaset.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl-c58b8b4d8 0 0 0 2m56s
Deployment is not ready:
NAME READY UP-TO-DATE AVAILABLE AGE
deployment.apps/sample-harbor-registryctl 0/1 1 0 2d3h
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments: 17
Commits related to this issue
- Fix(reconciliation) Rework reconciliation loop. Close #131. * Use server side apply instead of client side apply (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/server-side-apply/) Remove pkg/resou... — committed to sguyennet/harbor-operator by sguyennet 4 years ago
- Fix(reconciliation) Rework reconciliation loop. Close #131. * Use server side apply instead of client side apply (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/server-side-apply/) Remove pkg/resou... — committed to sguyennet/harbor-operator by sguyennet 4 years ago
- Fix(reconciliation) Rework reconciliation loop. Close #131. * Use server side apply instead of client side apply (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/server-side-apply/) Remove pkg/resou... — committed to sguyennet/harbor-operator by sguyennet 4 years ago
- Fix(reconciliation) Rework reconciliation loop. Close #131. * Use server side apply instead of client side apply (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/server-side-apply/) Remove pkg/resou... — committed to sguyennet/harbor-operator by sguyennet 4 years ago
- Fix(reconciliation) Rework reconciliation loop. Close #131. * Use server side apply instead of client side apply (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/server-side-apply/) Remove pkg/resou... — committed to sguyennet/harbor-operator by sguyennet 4 years ago
- Fix(reconciliation) Rework reconciliation loop. Close #131. * Use server side apply instead of client side apply (https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/using-api/server-side-apply/) Remove pkg/resou... — committed to sguyennet/harbor-operator by sguyennet 4 years ago
- Merge pull request #339 from sguyennet/dev/fix-registryctl Rework reconcilation loop. Fix #131. — committed to goharbor/harbor-operator by steven-zou 3 years ago
Hi Steven,
We identified the root cause of the issue. The operator is watching the secret of the registry internal certificate. When the secret is created, it is created empty and then populated with the certificate. For the operator the secret exist, therefore he deploy the registry and the registryctl. When the certificate is inserted in the secret the operator detect the modification and change the resource version of the registry, which trigger a redeploy of the registryctl because the checksum of the registry have changed.
I will modify the code of the operator in charge of checking if the secret exist or not.