falco: falco 0.31.1 occasionally unpacking fd.sip incorrectly on kernel 4.15.0?
Describe the bug
I don’t know if anyone else has reported similar, but a pattern we’ve been seeing after we upgraded to Falco 0.31.1 from 0.30.0 (we use the BPF probe) was that Falco started occasionally triggering events from container processes with unusual fd.sip ip addresses:
62.127.0.0 115.127.0.0 185.127.0.0 238.127.0.0 252.127.0.0
It seemed like it was wrongly unpacking/decoding the syscall info with some bitmask / pointer address being interpreted wrongly
How to reproduce it
Not clear at this time.
Expected behaviour
Falco would retrieve the syscall information accurately.
Screenshots
N/A
Environment
- Falco version: 0.31.1
- System info:
{"machine":"x86_64","nodename":"XXXXXXXX","release":"4.15.0-176-generic","sysname":"Linux","version":"#185-Ubuntu SMP Tue Mar 29 17:40:04 UTC 2022"}
- Cloud provider or hardware configuration:
- OS: Ubuntu 18.04.6 LTS
- Kernel: 4.15.0-176-generic
- Installation method: Kubernetes
Additional context
Rolling back to 0.30.0 with the same ruleset resolves the issue
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 2 years ago
- Comments: 20 (14 by maintainers)
Possibly related to this patch: https://github.com/falcosecurity/libs/pull/1059
It should be shipped with Falco 0.35; i will ping you to eventually test it if you still care 😃 Thank you! /remove-lifecycle stale
@leogr I need to re-test on 0.33.1, we have been pinned on 0.30.0 in the interim
@FedeDP there’s nothing special in the rules really, they’re simply copies of the samples for allowlisting outgoing connections to a range of port and IP combinations, with a tweaked output format and a set of permitted CIDR and port combinations for each host type:
https://github.com/falcosecurity/falco/blob/9392c0295a62d2e3f833f29d5d543cb99bb8b3a1/rules/falco_rules.yaml#L387-L396
These have worked fine since first introduced into our env with falco 0.17.0 and the kernel probe approx 3 years ago, and have continued in use through various upgrades (0.23.x / 0.26.x etc.) up until 0.30.0 without any noticeable issue. Approx 7 months ago t 0.30.0 we also migrated to using the BPF module and similarly saw no issue or regressions at that point in time.
However, after rolling out the 0.31.1 upgrade in our staging envs approx 2 weeks ago, we started seeing our alerting fire for these various unusual
fd.sipaddresses:The output field format from the event are:
Thank you @dnwe will try to understand what is going on here… If you find further information about the issue please add them here 😃