App: [HOLD for payment 2023-07-05] [$1000] Web - Chat - Mention list doesn't display when enter special key: '_-+=|\;`~ before:
If you haven’t already, check out our contributing guidelines for onboarding and email contributors@expensify.com to request to join our Slack channel!
Action Performed:
- Go to any chat
- Enter special key and @he (ex: _@he or `@he or ~@he)
Expected Result:
The mention suggestion display
Actual Result:
The mention suggestion doesn’t display
Workaround:
Unknown
Platforms:
Which of our officially supported platforms is this issue occurring on?
- Android / native
- Android / Chrome
- iOS / native
- iOS / Safari
- MacOS / Chrome / Safari
- MacOS / Desktop
Version Number: 1.3.24.4
Reproducible in staging?: yes
Reproducible in production?: yes
If this was caught during regression testing, add the test name, ID and link from TestRail:
Email or phone of affected tester (no customers):
Logs: https://stackoverflow.com/c/expensify/questions/4856
Notes/Photos/Videos: Any additional supporting documentation
Expensify/Expensify Issue URL:
Issue reported by: @dukenv0307
Slack conversation: https://expensify.slack.com/archives/C049HHMV9SM/p1685529049518369
Upwork Automation - Do Not Edit
- Upwork Job URL: https://www.upwork.com/jobs/~018585a2ed09409031
- Upwork Job ID: 1666822250965151744
- Last Price Increase: 2023-06-22
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created a year ago
- Comments: 43 (28 by maintainers)
Yes to:
\;` No to:'So the list of accepted should be the following IMO:
,/\?"{}[]()&^%$#<>!*=`;And let’s not add these characters there were discussed here at some point:
_+-@~|'@PauloGasparSv @abdulrahuman5196 You can see the current behavior on Slack and on Expensify for more information
BZ checklist
Not a regression. The characters in discussion was not previously added.
No. This is a minor case and wouldn’t we beneficial to add a regression test.
@dukenv0307 In the proposed changes, Since this is a regex change, kindly mention how you would change the regex to make this working.
This doesn’t provide complete information on how you would like to change the regex.
@PauloGasparSv I agree we should add a lower subset of character which don’t clash with existing experiences. Even if people want to add more we can do it in future if required. (Which i highly doubt will happen)