solutions-geoprocessing-toolbox: Issues after testing #500 in ArcMap
Issues after testing #500 in ArcMap:
Incident Hot Spot
- Change Parameter Name
Incidents_OptimizedHotSpotAn
toIncident Hot Spot
- Tool defaults back to ArcGIS/default.gdb
Hot Spot by Area
-
Keeps features selected after completed analysis (Clear Selection either in doc or tool)
-
Group result layers (Add a doc step)
Incident Density
- Raster output does not display
Incidents by LOC
- Not receiving expected results
Expected:
Received:
FYI
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 7 years ago
- Comments: 22 (22 by maintainers)
Commits related to this issue
- Fixes for Incident Analysis * Fixing #501 for Incident Hot Spots * Some minor doc changes in tool help — committed to Esri/solutions-geoprocessing-toolbox by mfunk 7 years ago
- Fixes for Incident Analysis Hot Spots By Area * Fixes for #501 * Fixes for #502 — committed to Esri/solutions-geoprocessing-toolbox by mfunk 7 years ago
@BobBooth I was just talking to @mfunk and it looks like the way we fix the symbology for Incidents by LOC is by changing the symbology classification in our sample layer file from manual to some other class breaks (preferably natural breaks)
@BobBooth So I modified the Count Incidents by LOC and also ran the tool you sent me. The output match each other, but still don’t match the original sample layer. So in this screenshot there are three coincident line features, so visually it will be hard to tell the difference so I labelled on FREQUENCY field where
On the road to the far left there is the greatest difference where the original counted 11 incidents and the modifications counted 35.
This is also showing another hidden bug that we haven’t found before. Notice that there are a bunch of floating 78’s in the middle but no road? Weird huh? The road does exist there, but our output symbology classification’s max break is at 76… effectively excluding anything that is a FREQUENCY of 77 or higher. While you can’t see it on this screenshot the actual FREQUENCY maximum is 85. So we are not displaying several roads that have VERY HIGH incident counts.
So I think we are back to removing the AOI from Count Incident By LOC.
I’ve verified that the various components of this issue have been resolved. Closing out.
@joebayles - I think the “Incident Density - Raster output does not display” issue is dependent on whether or not you have the Spatial Analyst extension checked on. I tried it and saw the same, but the output included the message: