Steps to reproduce
sudo apt-get install dotnet-sdk-2.1.300-rc1-008673
dotnet --version
sudo dotnet --version
Expected behavior
dotnet --version
2.1.300-rc1-008673
sudo dotnet --version
2.1.300-rc1-008673
Actual behavior
dotnet --version
Failed to initialize CoreCLR, HRESULT: 0x80004005
sudo dotnet --version
2.1.300-rc1-008673
Environment data
dotnet --info
Failed to initialize CoreCLR, HRESULT: 0x80004005
Host (useful for support):
Version: 2.1.0-rc1
Commit: eb9bc92051
.NET Core SDKs installed:
2.1.300-rc1-008673 [/usr/share/dotnet/sdk]
.NET Core runtimes installed:
Microsoft.AspNetCore.All 2.1.0-rc1-final [/usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.AspNetCore.All]
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App 2.1.0-rc1-final [/usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
Microsoft.NETCore.App 2.1.0-rc1 [/usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App]
To install additional .NET Core runtimes or SDKs:
https://aka.ms/dotnet-download
lsb_release -a
No LSB modules are available.
Distributor ID: Ubuntu
Description: Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS
Release: 16.04
Codename: xenial
uname -a
Linux BSS-IMM 4.4.0-17134-Microsoft dotnet/core-setup#48-Microsoft Fri Apr 27 18:06:00 PST 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
By default,
$TMPDIR
is empty on WSL (at least in the default profile used by bash in Ubuntu 18.04.1), sodotnet
should default to/tmp
, which is on alxfs
volume – thus supporting pipes, FIFOs, and other Unixy things.Setting
$TMPDIR
to anything under adrvfs
will makedotnet
fail with a less than helpful error message (drvfs
merely proxies Windows volumes to the WSL world, so I don’t think this will be supported even under WSL2 – don’t quote me on that, I haven’t tested it).Maybe this should be fixed in the documentation instead?
Ah that is it. I have the following.
If I change it to /tmp it works! Nice catch @jkotas and thanks for the feedback. I tried this with not opting out of the COMPlus_EnableDiagnostics and it is still working.
Not sure how we should handle that or how to document it. I guess the ownership of the issue is with WSL team? I will update their issue to indicate why this showed up now with .NET Core SDK.
Thanks everybody for your help on this one!
@jkotas another case where I wish customers had something better than
Failed to initialize CoreCLR, HRESULT: 0x80004005
Even if it’s just a code indicating what phase it failed in that they can search for.