diagnostics: (linux) dotnet-trace, dotnet-dump and dotnet-gcdump seem to leave the process in a state where it cannot be traced or dumped again.
AzureUser@machine-t:~$ sudo /home/AzureUser/.dotnet/tools/dotnet-trace collect --process-id 67295
No profile or providers specified, defaulting to trace profile 'cpu-sampling'
Provider Name Keywords Level Enabled By
Microsoft-DotNETCore-SampleProfiler 0x0000000000000000 Informational(4) --profile
Microsoft-Windows-DotNETRuntime 0x00000014C14FCCBD Informational(4) --profile
Process : /mnt/publish/process
Output File : /home/AzureUser/trace.nettrace
[00:00:00:00] Recording trace 102.00 (B)
Press <Enter> or <Ctrl+C> to exit...
Trace completed.
Run the same command again later…
AzureUser@machine:~$ sudo /home/AzureUser/.dotnet/tools/dotnet-trace collect --process-id 67295
No profile or providers specified, defaulting to trace profile 'cpu-sampling'
Provider Name Keywords Level Enabled By
Microsoft-DotNETCore-SampleProfiler 0x0000000000000000 Informational(4) --profile
Microsoft-Windows-DotNETRuntime 0x00000014C14FCCBD Informational(4) --profile
Unable to start a tracing session: Microsoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Client.ServerNotAvailableException: Process 67295 not running compatible .NET Core runtime.
at Microsoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Client.IpcClient.GetTransport(Int32 processId) in /_/src/Microsoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Client/DiagnosticsIpc/IpcClient.cs:line 63
at Microsoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Client.IpcClient.SendMessage(Int32 processId, IpcMessage message, IpcMessage& response) in /_/src/Microsoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Client/DiagnosticsIpc/IpcClient.cs:line 104
at Microsoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Client.EventPipeSession..ctor(Int32 processId, IEnumerable`1 providers, Boolean requestRundown, Int32 circularBufferMB) in /_/src/Microsoft.Diagnostics.NETCore.Client/DiagnosticsClient/EventPipeSession.cs:line 30
at Microsoft.Diagnostics.Tools.Trace.CollectCommandHandler.Collect(CancellationToken ct, IConsole console, Int32 processId, FileInfo output, UInt32 buffersize, String providers, String profile, TraceFileFormat format, TimeSpan duration, String clrevents, String clreventlevel) in /_/src/Tools/dotnet-trace/CommandLine/Commands/CollectCommand.cs:line 130
Unable to create session.
This occurs with both dotnet-trace and dotnet-dump running on:
Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS \n \l
.NET Core SDK (reflecting any global.json):
Version: 3.1.301
Commit: 7feb845744
Runtime Environment:
OS Name: ubuntu
OS Version: 18.04
OS Platform: Linux
RID: ubuntu.18.04-x64
Base Path: /usr/share/dotnet/sdk/3.1.301/
Host (useful for support):
Version: 3.1.5
Commit: 65cd789777
.NET Core SDKs installed:
3.1.301 [/usr/share/dotnet/sdk]
.NET Core runtimes installed:
Microsoft.AspNetCore.App 3.1.5 [/usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.AspNetCore.App]
Microsoft.NETCore.App 3.1.5 [/usr/share/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App]
To install additional .NET Core runtimes or SDKs:
https://aka.ms/dotnet-download
About this issue
- Original URL
- State: closed
- Created 4 years ago
- Comments: 56 (26 by maintainers)
@juliusfriedman createdump is an external command-line app that lives right next to
libcoreclr. Also, do you have a mount of the publish directory with the linux files from a Windows machine?See https://github.com/dotnet/diagnostics/blob/2e2e6775d46a31e44218d62657b4169fa13ac74d/documentation/debugging-coredump.md#L6
Given that you ran
sudo ulimit -c unlimitedbefore starting the failing process. You may be able to get a usable core dump by:coredump_filterfor the process at least 0x3f. See http://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man5/core.5.htmlkill -9 67295.If we had a core dump it might be useful to @josalem
It’s not critical now. I’ll try using an 18.04 VM then.
Yes. This code has a dedicated thread that sits in a loop accessing a blocking collection. It waits for the next item, takes it, writes it out, and goes back to waiting for the next item. It will spend most of its life blocked waiting for the next piece of data to be logged. When data is logged, the logger adds it to the blocking collection.
@josalem, Yes.
lldbinstalled.What should I do next?
lldb -p 67295process save-core?@josalem, @sdmaclea, @tommcdon anything else I can do?
@josalem